Musings on Indic origins of Abrahamic faiths

Bharatiya Puranas have a unique way of explaining the dance of consciousness – the separation of individual (Ego) from Param due to A-Vidya and its evolution (return journey) thru Vidya. This evolution happens in a multi-dimensional cosmic field, with the biological evolution being just one of those dimensions. If the modern science is Vidya in this three-dimensional world, the Para-Vidya leads the individual in the other dimensions.

It is said that the humanity was originally centered in Bharata-Varsha and any/all A-dharmic and Asuric forces are expelled from Bharat every time they were defeated. These Asuric forces left Bharatavarsha and spread all over the earth. They interacted/occupied the local inhabitants, if any, and developed new civilizations as reflections of their own consciousness and the little Vedic knowledge they could sustain. 

As the social convicts of Britian made today's Australia and USA, the Adharmic convicts of Bharat made all the other modern civilizations around the world.

Hindu Puranas are filled with continual raise of Asuric consciousness. All these Asuric individuals and forces have the same Vedic knowledge, often times more textual knowledge than their Dharmic counterparts as seen in the case of Trisira and Ravana. It is the difference in understanding and application of that Vedic knowledge that separated them from Dharmics. The main difference between the Asuric and Dharmic understanding of Vedic Sanatana Dharma is emphasis on and domination of Ego (individualism?) instead of the awareness of individual being an unrealized part of Param, respectively.

The trinity of Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) is no different from various Asuric and A-dharmic waves of Puranic individuals, eons and societies. All these Abrahamic faiths are ideologically intolerant – that is they cannot interact with non-conformance. The assumptions, justifications and methods they use is same as our Puranic ancestors. Like their ancestors, these modern Asuric forces too will be destroyed because they are A-dharmic a.k.a unsustainable.

Our Puranas tell us the story of Daksha Prajapati. He conducted an yajna (a project) and did not want to involve Shiva (Pasupati or ultimate-being). Shiva’s consort Sati goes there and self-immolates when she gets insulted by her father Daksha.  Learning that Shiva releases his pramadha-ganas to destroy Daksha and turns inwards in the absence of his female counterpart.

In the current cycle of these pramadha-ganas (dominant male conscious), must have gone westward causing the first Abrahamic wave – as described in Old Testament. This civilization is devoid of the female aspect of the consciousness. The sin is permanently attributed to Eve.

This left the Devi-ganas that represent the female consciousness rudderless. The Sakteya sect grow tantric in nature – where madya, mamsa, maidhunas are dominated. The un-channeled invocation of sensual forces dominated the social scene leading to concepts like slavery, harems the size of small towns etc.,

There are indications that Islam is a revival of estranged devi-ganas whose Kaaba is only the Yoni section of Shivalinga (which is a combination of Yoni and Linga).

This separation of male and female consciousness leads to the raise of Taraka-Asura. Taraka considered Shiva and Sati has his parents and but he did not believe in the re-unity of his parents. That is why he sought a boon to be killed only by the son of Shiva and Parvati. He mastered all materialistic sciences but lacked any spiritual awareness. He harnessed natural elements leading to a materialistic heaven on earth. But he was denied Yajna-bhaga/phala (reserved only to Dharmic Devatas).

The current cycle of Taraka-Asura is the raise of Christian consciousness in the west, with current USA representing the characteristics of Taraka-Asura. No wonder the Puranas call all the lands outside Bharatavarsha as Bhoga-bhoomi and only Bharatavarsha as Karma-bhoomi, where one receives the multi-dimensional result/insight/phala of his yajna.

Separated from Bharat, all these estranged humanity could not gain from the Sanatana Dharmic consciousness. So they missed out how their parent civilization reunited the separated male and female consciousness, whenever it happened.

Himavamta, invoked his Dharmic penance and got Sati devi re-born as his daughter Parvati. Entire Deva-gana did penance/yajna to bring Siva and Parvati together. They even sacrificed Manmadha (the embodiment of human desire of sensual pleasures) to bring these male and female consciousness together. Manmadha had to wait till Sri Krishna’s arrival to take a re-birth. Thus came the birth of Subrahmanya (su-brahmanya = the supreme embodiment of brahmana) who became the commander of dharmic forces putting an end to Taraka-Asura.

No wonder Adi-Samkara walked around Bharatavarsha just before the Islamic invasions of Bharat and re-establish the four Vedic mathas in four corners of Bharat. As part of his cleaning up of house before the Asuric invasions Adi-Samkara preserved the mantra-knowledge in local Tantric schools by taking it from certain practices, thus making sure that the invading devi-ganas do not get out of control with the acquisition of the root-knowledge. He also united various sakteya peethas with the corresponding shiva-peethas; many places marrying the local sakteya deity with shiva tatva; thus ensuring that the local sakteya body of knowledge do not merge with the invading devi-ganas devoid of Siva-tatva.

This also explains the obsession of these estranged populations with Bharatavarsha and its acceptance of their ideologies. No wonder some of the Bharatiya populations are very susceptible to these Asuric ideologies, because it is natural for humans to perceive the world thru their senses, no matter where they live.

Hence the observation of ‘Dhwajasthambha’ in some new churches in India, because Dhwajasthambha in a temple is indication of the ideology’s Veda-pramana. And also the obsession of Pakistan with Kashmir where mother Sati reborn as Parvathi.

So it is up to the current Dharmic forces to devise an appropriate strategy to destroy this version of tri-purasuras and bring back the natural union of Shiva and Parvati so the society becomes Su-brahmanya. Perhaps it needs the destruction of the modern Manmadha, Tarakasura and subjugation of Pramadha-ganas.

Secularism – A leash or shackle in Bharat’s neck? Epilogue

Imagine a hypothetical scenario. An unknown player has a nuclear bomb that it wants to use against a specific religious society.

Who will be the intended target and who will respond to the attack if the nuke is dropped on –

• Jerusalem

• Vatican

• Mecca

• Buddha Gaya

• Varanasi (or one of the many Hindu sacred sites)

How the response of say a secular USA differ from that of another secular nation India or Jewish Israel or an Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or Communist China in  each of the above scenario?

Would a secular India nuke the perpetrator when a nuclear bomb is dropped on Mecca? What happens to the entitlement of Indian Muslims, who make 15% of Indian population, over India’s nuclear policy?

zzz

That brings us back to the philosophical question Caesar raises to his intellectual father in the movie “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”. 

So what would be a Dharmic solution to Caesar’s conundrum? A dharmic guru would have told Caesar about the concept of all pervading God-consciousness and swa-dharma. Perhaps the dharmic guru would have foretold Caesar about the animistic behavior that his intellect wouldn’t surpass when the grand-father to be ‘perceivably’ intimidated by the neighbor leading to the "Rise of the Planet of the Apes".

The purpose of a Dharmic Guru is to make Caesar understand the role of the leash until he is fully humanized and to free his consciousness from his animistic/beastly behavior forever. But he would not demand the dharmics to wear a leash/shackle so Caesar feels more at home.

The anti-heroes of Independent India behaved exactly like their Abrahamic masters, by shackling the dharmic Bharat with Secularism instead of liberating their under-developed minority brethren. 

Dalitism – Creation of a new Abrahamic faith in India

After achieving the initial gains using their divide and conquer strategy in Bengal between Hindus and Muslims, the European colonialists needed an artificial separator in the Hindu majority south India. As part of this enterprise they misinterpreted and misquoted the Hindu Varna system as a reflection of European fascist and racist ideology and presented it to the selected sections of Indian society thru their missionary education system.

A product of such education system is Sri Jyotirao Phule, the inventor of the term "Dalit", who was spotted and prodded by his Christian neighbor to attend the Scottish Mission High school in his formative years. After graduating from the missionary high school, it did not take much time (less than a year) for Jyotirao to find a upper-caste insult so he can start his anti-Hindu movement that would later become the most potent tool in British social engineering arsenal in destroying the social and cultural fabric of India that is Bharat. The most revealing aspect of Jyotirao Phule’s ‘Satya Shodhak Samaj’ is its refusal to accept the foundations of Hindu dharma (Vedas as sacrosanct, Moorti worship and Chaturvarna System) in sync with the Abrahamic ideologies – Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Communism and Secularism. The viciousness of Jyotirao’s organization can be seen in the first project it undertook to organize remarriages for upper-caste Hindu widows instead of doing anything substantial for the so-called lower castes. How the remarriages of upper-caste widows is related to Dalit empowerment, no one knows.

As they were forced to leave India, the British colonizers used all their influence in undermining and eliminating the nationalistic leadership and intellectual base that might take the independent India towards its natural Hindu consciousness.   They carefully applied a reward and punishment model on Indian National Congress organization, the umbrella organization that lead Indian independence movement, such that only the anti-Hindu, Secular individuals can rise to its leadership roles.

When India achieved independence in 1947, this established secular intelligentsia ensured that the new constitution of India has its roots in the constitutions of Christian majority western nations than the local and more natural Hindu consciousness. Prime Minster Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. B.R Ambedkar silenced the Hindu voices by falsely blaming Hindu dharma for all the ills of Indian society while giving clean chit to centuries of Islamic and Christian rule.

Thus the B.R Ambedkar smriti, secularism based dharma shastra, became the constitution of India in 1947. Since then this secular, social constitution formed the basis for unexplained apathy toward anything Hindu and acceptance and adoption of any idea that is primarily born out of Abrahamic world-view. Since then the constitution was changed often to further empower the Christian and Muslim minority isolation while denying Hindu dharma its rightful place.

1992 marked the arrival of Hindu consciousness on Indian social scene. By destroying the Babri Masjid on Rama’s birth place in Ayodhya, the Hindu representatives demonstrated their intent to clean Indian national consciousness of such thuggish abominations. This event brought the anti-Hindu sleeper-cells in various government and social organizations back into action. Since then the shrillness of Dalit identity kept on increasing with the rate of decline of the ruling Congress party fortunes.

The recent attempts by Dalit organizations in organizing ‘Beef Festival’ in Osmania University, Hyderabad and current uproar on the B.R Ambedkar cartoons by various Dalit organizations must be seen from this angle. The manufactured Dalit identity is now ready with their Ambedkar smriti, giving the constitution the status of smriti (dharma sastra). They are following the Abrahamic path where the prophet and the book are above discussion, instead of the Indic path where the prophethood and sastra are open for debate and change (that is why we have so many versions of Ramayana and Mahabharata).

No wonder Kancha Ilaiah, the self-professed and west-supported Dalit intellectual, said this about B.R Ambedkar  “Ambedkar is to Dalits what the prophet is to Muslims. He should not be seen only as a constitution-maker, which the authors of the textbook seem to have presented him as; he is fast acquiring the status of prophet for the scheduled castes of the country,” 

Thus a new race “Dalit’ is invented. A new prophet B.R Ambedkar is manufactured. A group of Mullahs like Sri Kancha Ilaiah are being propped up. Unless the Hindu consciousness wakes up, the next version of Constitution of India will be a Dalit Bible along with a Dalit-Sharia.