Pakistan after Taliban takeover - A prediction

From its inception, Pakistan society has been very clear on what it wanted to be and it has been so all along. It is the UK and USA that put a secular/democratic disguise on Pakistan to avoid international criticism for supporting such a fanatic state.

Anyways, Pakistan finally found a way to continue its journey towards its fate. The current internal and external players of Pakistan game are

External:

1. US - Wants to use Pakistan against India (and potentially Russia). Also can use Pakistan, when the shit hits the fan against the Arabian Muslim nation states.

2. China - Wants to use this against India. Also as a transit route to ME

3. UK - Uses this as a reason to advise and meddle in USA’s geopolitical affairs.

4. India - Wants to avoid this problem altogether if it can. Since it doesn’t have the will to solve this problem itself, India will continue to face interesting challenges (like they are doing now with self-inflicted saffron terror)

5. Afghanistan - Wishes to get away from its orbit

6. KSA - A potential cheap supply of Islamic slaves

Internal

1. Rabid Anglicized Pakistani Elites (RAPE) - Wants to keep their secular life styles while enjoying Islamic benefits

2. Terrorist State of Pakistani Army (TSPA) - Want to keep their secular disguise for access to western weapon systems because they know Islam alone cannot win modern wars in military domain (they have less control/understanding on other social aspects of statehood)

3. Average Pakistani (mango-Abduls) - Busy with their lives, but firmly believe Islam is the solution because Islam provides divine approval for their Asuric consciousness.

4. Taliban - The self-designated army of Allah. These are the leaders who want to rule Pakistan (and the world) on behalf of Allah.

Assuming Pakistan gets overruled by Taliban -

Response of Internal Players

• RAPEs – Few RAPEs will be prosecuted and publicly beheaded. Majority of the RAPEs will run away to US, UK or Dubai as per their personal and business connections. The number of RAPEs emigrated will be limited to <1 million (including families, children etc). These people will still keep Islam in their sleeves while enjoying protection from their host societies. There is a high possibility that they will start behaving like our WKKs in taming world’s response against Talibani state of Pakistan.

• TSPA – Except for few senior/mid-level officers, who migrate outside due to their better economic connections there, all of TSPA will accept Taliban rule and become part of their militia. Even then, there is a high possibility that this militia will be managed in a feudalistic structure.

• Mango-Abduls –

a.       Sunnis – They will whole heartedly accept Taliban rule and Sharia

b.      Shias – Will accept Taliban rule and Sharia. If Iraq and other ME societies are any indication, there will not be any systematic persecution at the beginning. But as and when this happens, majority of them will knock at India’s doors instead of Irans.

c.       Others – Will accept Taliban and Sharia whole heartedly, but will get persecuted in a slow trickle.

d.      Cricket stadiums will be converted into weekly Sharia courts and will feed the asuric social needs for entertainment.

International challenges after Taliban take- over


Nuclear Weapons

o   USA & West will try to buy Paki nukes & Taliban might accept that deal. Assuming ~100 weapons, we can expect a $30-40 billion multi-year deal made with Taliban.

o   TSPA/Taliban will act more than smart and will keep a handful number of nukes hidden away. My gut feeling is that, they will limit it to 2-3 weapons.

o   There is a very high possibility that India will share majority of this financial burden. Western consultants will (even I can) come up with enough reasons why it is in India’s best interests to make this deal happen and India will agree

§  This will be sold as a chanikyan move by seculars, media and WKKs as a way to get some influence over Taliban/Paki behavior.

§  There is a possibility that India will be pressurized to get rid of its own nukes as a good will gesture. I have a strong feeling that India will not budge even under immense internal and external pressure. India already made its case that Indian nukes are against China threat.

o   China will try to cover its traces amidst this chaos. It will end up paying the west to avoid international embarrassment. It may also make a deal with TSPA/Taliban to keep some of the weapons in its control (against submitting them to the west) and Taliban will accept this deal, because they already have a couple kept away for emergency.

     Economic & Humanitarian help

o   Government tax revenues will be limited. So they will have to develop a less demanding economic model and Islamic mode of living can sustain this.  That doesn’t mean Taliban will be poor. They will get ample money from their nukes (explained below)

o   The west will continue to fund some humanitarian aid, which will take care of basic food problem, to a major extent. We will not see a major humanitarian crisis like in Africa just because the numbers are too high (>150 million) and mainly Indian WKKs (with enough western prompting) will not allow it. So India (for obvious reasons – who wants another 10 million immigrants?) might end-up feeding (directly or indirectly) most of Pakistanis.

Military Industrial Complex

o   The military industry will become similar to Iran situation. Will be able to produce heavy equipment but will not be technically advance.

o   There is a fair chance that some sections of TSPA will start black-water like security companies and sell their services to key GCC nations.

Response of External Players


China

o   In 10-20 years, Xinjiang will start showing the early signs of unrest.  China will try to suppress this in its natural way.  UK/USA will use this opportunity to hurt China & then we will start seeing a China nuke-flash point.

     India

o   J&K – If India moves smartly, there is a fair chance of regaining PoK. But will need to ensure that it is there for long haul (20-30 years). Initially China may oppose this, as its negotiations in nuke realm continue. Another factor that can influence China is how much importance and confidence it has on the possibility of transit route to ME. There is a very high chance that India will not be successful in this effort.

o   Indian Muslims – There is a fair chance that their faith in Talibani invincibility will increase. They may not make any overt move themselves, but there is a fair chance that we will see more political and material support to JK insurgency. Taliban movement (not Pakis) will sneak into India.

o   WKKs – They will use Taliban scare to maximize their position over dhimmi secular Hindu majority. This will succeed in the short term (10-15 years). There is a fair chance that it will lead to further raise in Congress System fortunes.

o   There is another parallel development that is very important to this scenario. Supreme court decision on extending caste based reservations to converted Dalits. If that happens, the face of Indian electorate will change dramatically. Right now we have IMs – 15%, Christians 10%, Hindus – 75%. After this decision it will be IMs – 15%, Christians 40%, Hindus 45%. This will heavily influence Indian response to Talibanized Pakistan in many realms. If this doesn’t happen, Talibanization of Pakistan will be in Indian interests as I wrote in 2010.

West

o   West will go unscarred from this development. It will absorb few tens of thousands of RAPEs who come with their bank accounts and political connections back home, which will come to use in future.

o   RAPEs will be made into a Pakistani equivalent of Hurriyat/Khalistanis for future  use.

Musings on Indic origins of Abrahamic faiths

Bharatiya Puranas have a unique way of explaining the dance of consciousness – the separation of individual (Ego) from Param due to A-Vidya and its evolution (return journey) thru Vidya. This evolution happens in a multi-dimensional cosmic field, with the biological evolution being just one of those dimensions. If the modern science is Vidya in this three-dimensional world, the Para-Vidya leads the individual in the other dimensions.

It is said that the humanity was originally centered in Bharata-Varsha and any/all A-dharmic and Asuric forces are expelled from Bharat every time they were defeated. These Asuric forces left Bharatavarsha and spread all over the earth. They interacted/occupied the local inhabitants, if any, and developed new civilizations as reflections of their own consciousness and the little Vedic knowledge they could sustain. 

As the social convicts of Britian made today's Australia and USA, the Adharmic convicts of Bharat made all the other modern civilizations around the world.

Hindu Puranas are filled with continual raise of Asuric consciousness. All these Asuric individuals and forces have the same Vedic knowledge, often times more textual knowledge than their Dharmic counterparts as seen in the case of Trisira and Ravana. It is the difference in understanding and application of that Vedic knowledge that separated them from Dharmics. The main difference between the Asuric and Dharmic understanding of Vedic Sanatana Dharma is emphasis on and domination of Ego (individualism?) instead of the awareness of individual being an unrealized part of Param, respectively.

The trinity of Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) is no different from various Asuric and A-dharmic waves of Puranic individuals, eons and societies. All these Abrahamic faiths are ideologically intolerant – that is they cannot interact with non-conformance. The assumptions, justifications and methods they use is same as our Puranic ancestors. Like their ancestors, these modern Asuric forces too will be destroyed because they are A-dharmic a.k.a unsustainable.

Our Puranas tell us the story of Daksha Prajapati. He conducted an yajna (a project) and did not want to involve Shiva (Pasupati or ultimate-being). Shiva’s consort Sati goes there and self-immolates when she gets insulted by her father Daksha.  Learning that Shiva releases his pramadha-ganas to destroy Daksha and turns inwards in the absence of his female counterpart.

In the current cycle of these pramadha-ganas (dominant male conscious), must have gone westward causing the first Abrahamic wave – as described in Old Testament. This civilization is devoid of the female aspect of the consciousness. The sin is permanently attributed to Eve.

This left the Devi-ganas that represent the female consciousness rudderless. The Sakteya sect grow tantric in nature – where madya, mamsa, maidhunas are dominated. The un-channeled invocation of sensual forces dominated the social scene leading to concepts like slavery, harems the size of small towns etc.,

There are indications that Islam is a revival of estranged devi-ganas whose Kaaba is only the Yoni section of Shivalinga (which is a combination of Yoni and Linga).

This separation of male and female consciousness leads to the raise of Taraka-Asura. Taraka considered Shiva and Sati has his parents and but he did not believe in the re-unity of his parents. That is why he sought a boon to be killed only by the son of Shiva and Parvati. He mastered all materialistic sciences but lacked any spiritual awareness. He harnessed natural elements leading to a materialistic heaven on earth. But he was denied Yajna-bhaga/phala (reserved only to Dharmic Devatas).

The current cycle of Taraka-Asura is the raise of Christian consciousness in the west, with current USA representing the characteristics of Taraka-Asura. No wonder the Puranas call all the lands outside Bharatavarsha as Bhoga-bhoomi and only Bharatavarsha as Karma-bhoomi, where one receives the multi-dimensional result/insight/phala of his yajna.

Separated from Bharat, all these estranged humanity could not gain from the Sanatana Dharmic consciousness. So they missed out how their parent civilization reunited the separated male and female consciousness, whenever it happened.

Himavamta, invoked his Dharmic penance and got Sati devi re-born as his daughter Parvati. Entire Deva-gana did penance/yajna to bring Siva and Parvati together. They even sacrificed Manmadha (the embodiment of human desire of sensual pleasures) to bring these male and female consciousness together. Manmadha had to wait till Sri Krishna’s arrival to take a re-birth. Thus came the birth of Subrahmanya (su-brahmanya = the supreme embodiment of brahmana) who became the commander of dharmic forces putting an end to Taraka-Asura.

No wonder Adi-Samkara walked around Bharatavarsha just before the Islamic invasions of Bharat and re-establish the four Vedic mathas in four corners of Bharat. As part of his cleaning up of house before the Asuric invasions Adi-Samkara preserved the mantra-knowledge in local Tantric schools by taking it from certain practices, thus making sure that the invading devi-ganas do not get out of control with the acquisition of the root-knowledge. He also united various sakteya peethas with the corresponding shiva-peethas; many places marrying the local sakteya deity with shiva tatva; thus ensuring that the local sakteya body of knowledge do not merge with the invading devi-ganas devoid of Siva-tatva.

This also explains the obsession of these estranged populations with Bharatavarsha and its acceptance of their ideologies. No wonder some of the Bharatiya populations are very susceptible to these Asuric ideologies, because it is natural for humans to perceive the world thru their senses, no matter where they live.

Hence the observation of ‘Dhwajasthambha’ in some new churches in India, because Dhwajasthambha in a temple is indication of the ideology’s Veda-pramana. And also the obsession of Pakistan with Kashmir where mother Sati reborn as Parvathi.

So it is up to the current Dharmic forces to devise an appropriate strategy to destroy this version of tri-purasuras and bring back the natural union of Shiva and Parvati so the society becomes Su-brahmanya. Perhaps it needs the destruction of the modern Manmadha, Tarakasura and subjugation of Pramadha-ganas.

Secularism – A leash or shackle in Bharat’s neck? Epilogue

Imagine a hypothetical scenario. An unknown player has a nuclear bomb that it wants to use against a specific religious society.

Who will be the intended target and who will respond to the attack if the nuke is dropped on –

• Jerusalem

• Vatican

• Mecca

• Buddha Gaya

• Varanasi (or one of the many Hindu sacred sites)

How the response of say a secular USA differ from that of another secular nation India or Jewish Israel or an Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or Communist China in  each of the above scenario?

Would a secular India nuke the perpetrator when a nuclear bomb is dropped on Mecca? What happens to the entitlement of Indian Muslims, who make 15% of Indian population, over India’s nuclear policy?

zzz

That brings us back to the philosophical question Caesar raises to his intellectual father in the movie “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”. 

So what would be a Dharmic solution to Caesar’s conundrum? A dharmic guru would have told Caesar about the concept of all pervading God-consciousness and swa-dharma. Perhaps the dharmic guru would have foretold Caesar about the animistic behavior that his intellect wouldn’t surpass when the grand-father to be ‘perceivably’ intimidated by the neighbor leading to the "Rise of the Planet of the Apes".

The purpose of a Dharmic Guru is to make Caesar understand the role of the leash until he is fully humanized and to free his consciousness from his animistic/beastly behavior forever. But he would not demand the dharmics to wear a leash/shackle so Caesar feels more at home.

The anti-heroes of Independent India behaved exactly like their Abrahamic masters, by shackling the dharmic Bharat with Secularism instead of liberating their under-developed minority brethren. 

Dalitism – Creation of a new Abrahamic faith in India

After achieving the initial gains using their divide and conquer strategy in Bengal between Hindus and Muslims, the European colonialists needed an artificial separator in the Hindu majority south India. As part of this enterprise they misinterpreted and misquoted the Hindu Varna system as a reflection of European fascist and racist ideology and presented it to the selected sections of Indian society thru their missionary education system.

A product of such education system is Sri Jyotirao Phule, the inventor of the term "Dalit", who was spotted and prodded by his Christian neighbor to attend the Scottish Mission High school in his formative years. After graduating from the missionary high school, it did not take much time (less than a year) for Jyotirao to find a upper-caste insult so he can start his anti-Hindu movement that would later become the most potent tool in British social engineering arsenal in destroying the social and cultural fabric of India that is Bharat. The most revealing aspect of Jyotirao Phule’s ‘Satya Shodhak Samaj’ is its refusal to accept the foundations of Hindu dharma (Vedas as sacrosanct, Moorti worship and Chaturvarna System) in sync with the Abrahamic ideologies – Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Communism and Secularism. The viciousness of Jyotirao’s organization can be seen in the first project it undertook to organize remarriages for upper-caste Hindu widows instead of doing anything substantial for the so-called lower castes. How the remarriages of upper-caste widows is related to Dalit empowerment, no one knows.

As they were forced to leave India, the British colonizers used all their influence in undermining and eliminating the nationalistic leadership and intellectual base that might take the independent India towards its natural Hindu consciousness.   They carefully applied a reward and punishment model on Indian National Congress organization, the umbrella organization that lead Indian independence movement, such that only the anti-Hindu, Secular individuals can rise to its leadership roles.

When India achieved independence in 1947, this established secular intelligentsia ensured that the new constitution of India has its roots in the constitutions of Christian majority western nations than the local and more natural Hindu consciousness. Prime Minster Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. B.R Ambedkar silenced the Hindu voices by falsely blaming Hindu dharma for all the ills of Indian society while giving clean chit to centuries of Islamic and Christian rule.

Thus the B.R Ambedkar smriti, secularism based dharma shastra, became the constitution of India in 1947. Since then this secular, social constitution formed the basis for unexplained apathy toward anything Hindu and acceptance and adoption of any idea that is primarily born out of Abrahamic world-view. Since then the constitution was changed often to further empower the Christian and Muslim minority isolation while denying Hindu dharma its rightful place.

1992 marked the arrival of Hindu consciousness on Indian social scene. By destroying the Babri Masjid on Rama’s birth place in Ayodhya, the Hindu representatives demonstrated their intent to clean Indian national consciousness of such thuggish abominations. This event brought the anti-Hindu sleeper-cells in various government and social organizations back into action. Since then the shrillness of Dalit identity kept on increasing with the rate of decline of the ruling Congress party fortunes.

The recent attempts by Dalit organizations in organizing ‘Beef Festival’ in Osmania University, Hyderabad and current uproar on the B.R Ambedkar cartoons by various Dalit organizations must be seen from this angle. The manufactured Dalit identity is now ready with their Ambedkar smriti, giving the constitution the status of smriti (dharma sastra). They are following the Abrahamic path where the prophet and the book are above discussion, instead of the Indic path where the prophethood and sastra are open for debate and change (that is why we have so many versions of Ramayana and Mahabharata).

No wonder Kancha Ilaiah, the self-professed and west-supported Dalit intellectual, said this about B.R Ambedkar  “Ambedkar is to Dalits what the prophet is to Muslims. He should not be seen only as a constitution-maker, which the authors of the textbook seem to have presented him as; he is fast acquiring the status of prophet for the scheduled castes of the country,” 

Thus a new race “Dalit’ is invented. A new prophet B.R Ambedkar is manufactured. A group of Mullahs like Sri Kancha Ilaiah are being propped up. Unless the Hindu consciousness wakes up, the next version of Constitution of India will be a Dalit Bible along with a Dalit-Sharia.

Secularism – A leash or shackle in Bharat’s neck? Part 4- End of Secularism

What does the future hold for Secularism? Can it thrive against the pull of Christianity in Christian societies and can it constrain non-Christian societies perpetually?

There are four social laboratories we can study to understand Secularism's relevance and its future.

Europe: The European nations kept their Christian characteristics to this day despite their secular constitutions. These societies fund and support Christian proselytization around the world with active support from their secular governments under the banner of Human Rights and Non-Governmental organizations. 

USA: America is even worse when it comes to maintaining its secular credentials where some of the state governments still hold ban on abortions and female contraceptives. Christian laws and worldview are held supreme in the guise of democracy by the Christian majority in USA. With the help of its European brothers this Christian majority nation actively provides governmental support to its Christian religious organizations and crusades under the banner of multi-national organizations.

Turkey: Turkish society kept its secular façade as long as there was hope of it joining the European Union. But once this dream is shattered the Turkish society did not have any obligation to respect the hegemony of Christian west and started to represent its national character. In just a decade Turkey severed its secular (Christianity without Church) shackles and started participating in the regional Islamic politics. We can expect to see Turkey making visible and important display of its Islamic ambitions.

That brings us back to India.

India: While the national leadership never fulfilled the promises of secularism to its Hindu majority, the past decade has seen overt infringement of national interests and majority Hindu interests by the Christian and Muslim minority groups under the protection of the so-called secular forces. The Government of India crushed any and every movement by Indic-origin insurgencies (the manner in which the Khalistan movement was crushed) while making endless compromises when it comes to Christian insurgencies in the North East or Islamic insurgencies in Kashmir and rest of India (Indian Mujaheddin and SIMI).

Besides paying the Haj subsidy for the Muslims and Jerusalem subsidy to the Christians (by Government of Andhra Pradesh) the current political dispensation of India also allows minority religious intervention in key national interest areas.

It is a well-known and well recorded fact how Indian Muslim civil and religious organizations influence various political decisions of the state using their vote-bank politics. They were able to influence the well-seated (400 MPs out of 540 MPs) Rajiv Gandhi government to amend the Constitution so they can subvert a Supreme Court ruling in Shah Bano case as far as 1986 and how they resisted the Uniform Civil Code bill since 1947.

The Christian minority of India did no less to destroy the national unity since independence. They continue with their forced religious conversions without any forbearance, often using the international organizations like Human Rights and NGO groups to subvert any attempts of the states to control their indiscriminate proselytization practices. Most recent examples are the Christian missionary and NGO movement to subvert the Kudankulam Atomic Power Project with funds from American and European NGOs and the Catholic Archbishop Mar George Alencherry, who tried to influence the Catholic ministers of Kerala government in the case of Kerala fishermen murder by Italian merchant ship sailors at the behest of Pope.

Sooner than later the Indian Hindu majority will realize that the international community and external controlled religious groups are not following the rules they forced upon it under the guise of Secularism.

When that realization dawns it will not take much time for the Indian Hindu majority to break the shackles of Secularism and assert its Hindu identity and ethos as Turkish Muslim majority has demonstrated.

Secularism – A leash or shackle in Bharat’s neck? Part 3 National Cohesion in Secular India

The founding fathers offered two key benefits to the nation from accepting secularism as a foundation of Independent India. Firstly it is said to unite Hindus and secondly it is said to assuage the minority communities. Did the independent India reap these benefits from secularism?

The Hindu majority of independent India remained as united as it was during centuries of foreign rule. It formed no vote banks based on religion, kept its caste/clan based identities. The variations in Hindu majority are further exploited by the very congress system that promised to unite Hindu majority in return for it accepting Secularism in its civil and criminal social transactions. What secularism (Christianity without church) did in reality is that it slowly took away the civilizational memory from the newer generations of Indian Hindus. Hindu culture and heritage are fast losing their relationship to the local flora-fauna and are being analyzed from non-Indic ideological structures. The very Hindu-unity that is promised is getting systematically destroyed.

In fact secularism became a bane for Indian Hindus. The Hindu majority did not get any additional security in Independent India due to their secular laws. The secular laws does not protect Hindus in Punjab, Kashmir, North East, Kerala, Bengal, Orissa etc., Their unity is remained a mirage in secular India. The root cause of this is the fact that by definition secularism is nothing but non-Hinduism, then how can it allow Hindu unity?

At the same time the religious minorities of India did not feel any additional security in a secular-India. The most interesting aspect of this is the separatist movements in the Christian majority North-Eastern India. There is the perpetual Kashmir insurgency problem. Then there are two separatist movements with Indic roots – Khalistan movement in Punjab and Tamil Eelam demands in Sri Lanka. In all these scenarios the secular constitution of India could not calm down the ever anxious religious minorities of Indian union. The response of Indian state to these separatist movements is also something to be observed.

In spite of accepting secularism as the constitutional structure of independent India, it did not achieve much cohesion between the Hindu majority and religious minorities of independent India. There have been more than 50 notable religious riots in the nation. The worst religious riot in sub-continental history happened in 1947 under the watch of the very founding fathers of this nation. 

Secularism – A leash or shackle in Bharat’s neck? Part 2 - Secularization of India

Since there is no philanthropy involved in imperialistic politics, the British applied whatever governance model/laws that they followed in Britain to their Indian colony. Indiscriminate slave trade was conducted in India by East India Company until it was made unlawful in Britain in 1807. Similarly, secularism was introduced to India in the second-half of 19^th century as it became the governance model in Britain. For the British rulers, secularism ensured that they are not entangled in the historical burden of Hindu-Muslim social tension (even though they used this to make political gains), whereas for the Indian intellectual elite of the 19th century, which was a creation of the British rule, this is an opportunity to grow their power and influence for its making a departure from medieval (Islamic) polity in which the state was considered more or less the private property of the ruler.

The first secular act of British Government in India was the Religious Endowments Act in 1863, which appropriated the rents and produce of lands granted mainly for the support of Hindu temples. A similar act introduced for Muslim religious properties and trusts – conceded the Indian Muslims’ right to establish Wakfs and keep it separate from the state appropriation. It is important to note that there was hardly any Christian church property in India at that time.

Another secular act that had universal application for all Indians was the Child Marriage Restraint Act introduced in 1929. In addition to these laws, the British government of India codified and enacted various laws; separate for Hindus and Muslims, mainly in the realm of financial transactions.

The true secularization of India, especially in the sense of “Christianization of India without Church”, happened under the leadership of the first prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru (JLN). A secularized version of Hindu law was codified and enacted into law (Hindu Marriage Act (1955), Hindu Succession Act (1956), Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act (1956), and Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956)) during his leadership. In this process, JLN trampled on various philosophical principles of Sanatana Dharma a.k.a Hinduism such as Vivaaha, Purusharthas and Asrama Dharmas etc., and replaced them with secular (read Christian Law minus Church theology) ritual aspects in their place.

JLN sold this secularism to Indian public in the guise of uniting the Hindu population, by standardizing the personal laws of Hindu majority. In their penchant for secularism the leadership of independent India ignored the fact that the unifying factor of Hinduism is not the locally developed rituals but the dharmic philosophies that all these locally disparate rituals represent and abide by.

The Christian minorities never needed a secular law because the so-called secular law is nothing but a Christian social contract minus the church.

JLN did not and could not press the Indian Muslim population to come under the secular uniform civil code because they squarely denied the government of India in interfering with their personal lives and religious beliefs.

Thus the secular leadership brigade of Independent India snatched away the Hindu dharmic philosophy from the civil relationships of majority Hindu population.